MDR – Article 107 – Conflict of interests

Article 107

Conflict of interests

1. Members of the MDCG, its sub-groups, and members of expert panels and expert laboratories shall not have financial or other interests in the medical device industry which could affect their impartiality. They shall undertake to act in the public interest and in an independent manner. They shall declare any direct or indirect interests they may have in the medical device industry and update that declaration whenever a relevant change occurs. The declaration of interests shall be made publicly available on the Commission website. This Article shall not apply to the representatives of stakeholder organisations participating in the sub-groups of the MDCG.

2. Experts and other third parties invited by the MDCG on a case-by-case basis shall declare any interests they may have in the issue in question.

MDR – Article 106 – Provision of scientific, technical and clinical opinions and advice

Article 106

Provision of scientific, technical and clinical opinions and advice

1. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts and in consultation with the MDCG, make provision for expert panels to be designated for the assessment of the clinical evaluation in relevant medical fields as referred to in paragraph 9 of this Article and to provide views in accordance with Article 48(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on the performance evaluation of certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices and, where necessary, for categories or groups of devices, or for specific hazards relating to categories or groups of devices, observing the principles of highest scientific competence, impartiality, independence and transparency. The same principles shall apply where the Commission decides to appoint expert laboratories in accordance with paragraph 7 of this Article.

2. Expert panels and expert laboratories may be designated in areas where the Commission, in consultation with the MDCG, has identified a need for the provision of consistent scientific, technical and/or clinical advice or laboratory expertise in relation to the implementation of this Regulation. Expert panels and expert laboratories may be appointed on a standing or temporary basis.

3. Expert panels shall consist of advisors appointed by the Commission on the basis of up-to-date clinical, scientific or technical expertise in the field and with a geographical distribution that reflects the diversity of scientific and clinical approaches in the Union. The Commission shall determine the number of members of each panel in accordance with the requisite needs.

The members of expert panels shall perform their tasks with impartiality and objectivity. They shall neither seek nor take instructions from notified bodies or manufacturers. Each member shall draw up a declaration of interests, which shall be made publicly available.

The Commission shall establish systems and procedures to actively manage and prevent potential conflicts of interest.

4. Expert panels shall take into account relevant information provided by stakeholders including patients’ organisations and healthcare professionals when preparing their scientific opinions.

5. The Commission, following consultation with the MDCG, may appoint advisors to expert panels following publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and on the Commission website following a call for expressions of interest. Depending on the type of task and the need for specific expertise, advisors may be appointed to the expert panels for a maximum period of three years and their appointment may be renewed.

6. The Commission, following consultation with the MDCG, may include advisors on a central list of available experts who, whilst not being formally appointed to a panel, are available to provide advice and to support the work of the expert panel as needed. That list shall be published on the Commission website.

7. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts and following consultation with the MDCG, designate expert laboratories, on the basis of their expertise in:

—physico-chemical characterisation, or
—microbiological, biocompatibility, mechanical, electrical, electronic
or non-clinical biological and toxicological testing

of specific devices, categories or groups of devices.

The Commission shall only designate expert laboratories for which a Member State or the Joint Research Centre has submitted an application for designation.

8. Expert laboratories shall satisfy the following criteria:

(a)have adequate and appropriately qualified staff with adequate
knowledge and experience in the field of the devices for which theyare designated;
(b)possess the necessary equipment to carry out the tasks assigned to
them;
(c)have the necessary knowledge of international standards and best
practices;
(d)have an appropriate administrative organisation and structure;
(e)ensure that their staff observe the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks.

9. Expert panels appointed for clinical evaluation in relevant medical fields shall fulfil the tasks provided for in Article 54(1) and Article 61(2) and Section 5.1 of Annex IX or Section 6 of Annex X, as applicable.

10. Expert panels and expert laboratories may have the following tasks, depending on the requisite needs:

(a)to provide scientific, technical and clinical assistance to the
Commission and the MDCG in relation to the implementation of thisRegulation;
(b)to contribute to the development and maintenance of appropriate
guidance and CS for:
— clinical investigations,
— clinical evaluation and PMCF,
— performance studies,
— performance evaluation and post-market performance follow-up,— physico-chemical characterisation, and
— microbiological, biocompatibility, mechanical, electrical,
electronic or non-clinical toxicological testing

for specific devices, or a category or group of devices, or for specific hazards related to a category or group of devices;

(c)to develop and review clinical evaluation guidance and performance evaluation guidance for performance of conformity assessment in
line with the state of the art with regard to clinical evaluation,
performance evaluation, physico-chemical characterisation, and
microbiological, biocompatibility, mechanical, electrical, electronic
or non- clinical toxicological testing;
(d)to contribute to the development of standards at international level,ensuring that such standards reflect the state of the art;
(e)to provide opinions in response to consultations by manufacturers
in accordance with Article 61(2), notified bodies and Member States
in accordance with paragraphs 11 to 13 of this Article.
(f)to contribute to identification of concerns and emerging issues on
the safety and performance of medical devices;
(g)to provide views in accordance with Article 48(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on the performance evaluation of certain in vitro
diagnostic medical devices.

11. The Commission, shall facilitate the access of Member States and notified bodies and manufacturers to advice provided by expert panels and expert laboratories concerning, inter alia, the criteria for an appropriate data set for assessment of the conformity of a device, in particular with regard to the clinical data required for clinical evaluation, with regard to physico-chemical characterisation, and with regard to microbiological, biocompatibility, mechanical, electrical, electronic and non-clinical toxicological testing.

12. When adopting its scientific opinion in accordance with paragraph 9, the members of the expert panels shall use their best endeavours to reach consensus. If consensus cannot be reached, the expert panels shall decide by a majority of their members, and the scientific opinion shall mention the divergent positions and the grounds on which they are based.

The Commission shall publish the scientific opinion and advice delivered in accordance with paragraphs 9 and 11 of this Article, ensuring consideration of aspects of confidentiality as set out in Article 109. The clinical evaluation guidance referred to in point (c) of paragraph 10 shall be published following consultation with the MDCG.

13. The Commission may require manufacturers and notified bodies to pay fees for the advice provided by expert panels and expert laboratories. The structure and the level of fees as well as the scale and structure of recoverable costs shall be adopted by the Commission by means of implementing acts, taking into account the objectives of the adequate implementation of this Regulation, protection of health and safety, support of innovation and cost-effectiveness and the necessity to achieve active participation in the expert panels. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(3).

14. The fees payable to the Commission in accordance with the procedure under paragraph 13 of this Article shall be set in a transparent manner and on the basis of the costs for the services provided. The fees payable shall be reduced in the case of a clinical evaluation consultation procedure initiated in accordance with point (c) of Section 5.1 of Annex IX involving a manufacturer who is a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC.

15. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 115 to amend the tasks of expert panels and expert laboratories referred to in paragraph 10 of this Article.

MDR – Article 105 – Tasks of the MDCG

Article 105

Tasks of the MDCG

Under this Regulation, the MDCG shall have the following tasks:

(a)to contribute to the assessment of applicant conformity assessment
bodies and notified bodies pursuant to the provisions set out in
Chapter IV;
(b)to advise the Commission, at its request, in matters concerning the
coordination group of notified bodies as established pursuant to
Article 49;
(c)to contribute to the development of guidance aimed at ensuring
effective and harmonised implementation of this Regulation, in
particular regarding the designation and monitoring of notified
bodies, application of the general safety and performance
requirements and conduct of clinical evaluations and investigationsby manufacturers, assessment by notified bodies and vigilance
activities;
(d)to contribute to the continuous monitoring of technical progress and assessment of whether the general safety and performance
requirements laid down in this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 are adequate to ensure safety and performance of devices, and
thereby contribute to identifying whether there is a need to amend Annex I to this Regulation;
(e)to contribute to the development of device standards, of CS and of
scientific guidelines, including product specific guidelines, on
clinical investigation of certain devices in particular implantable
devices and class III devices;
(f)to assist the competent authorities of the Member States in their
coordination activities in particular in the fields of classification andthe determination of the regulatory status of devices, clinical
investigations, vigilance and market surveillance including the
development and maintenance of a framework for a European
market surveillance programme with the objective of achieving
efficiency and harmonisation of market surveillance in the Union, in accordance with Article 93;
(g)to provide advice, either on its own initiative or at request of the
Commission, in the assessment of any issue related to the
implementation of this Regulation;
(h)to contribute to harmonised administrative practice with regard to
devices in the Member States.

MDR – Article 104 – Support by the Commission

Article 104

Support by the Commission

The Commission shall support the functioning of the cooperation between national competent authorities. It shall, in particular, provide for the organisation of exchanges of experience between the competent authorities and provide technical, scientific and logistic support to the MDCG and its sub-groups. It shall organise the meetings of the MDCG and its sub-groups, participate in those meetings and ensure the appropriate follow-up.

MDR – Article 103 – Medical Device Coordination Group

Article 103

Medical Device Coordination Group

1. A Medical Device Coordination Group (‘MDCG’) is hereby established.

2. Each Member State shall appoint to the MDCG, for a three-year term which may be renewed, one member and one alternate each with expertise in the field of medical devices, and one member and one alternate with expertise in the field of in vitro diagnostic medical devices. A Member State may choose to appoint only one member and one alternate, each with expertise in both fields.

The members of the MDCG shall be chosen for their competence and experience in the field of medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices. They shall represent the competent authorities of the Member States. The names and affiliation of members shall be made public by the Commission.

The alternates shall represent and vote for the members in their absence.

3. The MDCG shall meet at regular intervals and, where the situation requires, upon request by the Commission or a Member State. The meetings shall be attended either by the members appointed for their role and expertise in the field of medical devices, or by the members appointed for their expertise in the field of in vitro diagnostic medical devices, or by the members appointed for their expertise in both fields, or their alternates, as appropriate.

4. The MDCG shall use its best endeavours to reach consensus. If such consensus cannot be reached, the MDCG shall decide by a majority of its members. Members with diverging positions may request that their positions and the grounds on which they are based be recorded in the MDCG’s position.

5. The MDCG shall be chaired by a representative of the Commission. The chair shall not take part in votes of the MDCG.

6. The MDCG may invite, on a case-by-case basis, experts and other third parties to attend meetings or provide written contributions.

7. The MDCG may establish standing or temporary sub-groups. Where appropriate, organisations representing the interests of the medical device industry, healthcare professionals, laboratories, patients and consumers at Union level shall be invited to such sub-groups in the capacity of observers.

8. The MDCG shall establish its rules of procedure which shall, in particular, lay down procedures for the following:

—the adoption of opinions or recommendations or other positions,
including in cases of urgency;
—the delegation of tasks to reporting and co-reporting members;
—the implementation of Article 107 regarding conflict of interests;
—the functioning of sub-groups.

9. The MDCG shall have the tasks laid down in Article 105 of this Regulation and Article 99 of Regulation (EU) 2017/746.

MDR – Article 102 – Cooperation

Article 102

Cooperation

1. The competent authorities of the Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission. The Commission shall provide for the organisation of exchanges of information necessary to enable this Regulation to be applied uniformly.

2. Member States shall, with the support of the Commission, participate, where appropriate, in initiatives developed at international level with the aim of ensuring cooperation between regulatory authorities in the field of medical devices.

MDR – Article 101 – Competent authorities

Article 101

Competent authorities

The Member States shall designate the competent authority or authorities responsible for the implementation of this Regulation. They shall entrust their authorities with the powers, resources, equipment and knowledge necessary for the proper performance of their tasks pursuant to this Regulation. The Member States shall communicate the names and contact details of the competent authorities to the Commission which shall publish a list of competent authorities.

MDR – Article 100 – Electronic system on market surveillance

Article 100

Electronic system on market surveillance

1. The Commission, in collaboration with the Member States, shall set up and manage an electronic system to collate and process the following information:

(a)summaries of the results of the surveillance activities referred to inArticle 93(4);
(b)the final inspection report referred to in Article 93(7);
(c)information in relation to devices presenting an unacceptable risk to health and safety as referred to in Article 95(2), (4) and (6);
(d)information in relation to non-compliance of products as referred to in Article 97(2);
(e)information in relation to the preventive health protection measures referred to in Article 98(2);
(f)summaries of the results of the reviews and assessments of the
market surveillance activities of the Member States referred to in 93(8).

2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be immediately transmitted through the electronic system to all competent authorities concerned and, where applicable, to the notified body that issued a certificate in accordance with Article 56 for the device concerned and be accessible to the Member States and to the Commission.

3. Information exchanged between Member States shall not be made public where to do so might impair market surveillance activities and co-operation between Member States.

MDR – Article 99 – Good administrative practice

Article 99

Good administrative practice

1. Any measure adopted by the competent authorities of the Member States pursuant to Articles 95 to 98 shall state the exact grounds on which it is based. Where such a measure is addressed to a specific economic operator, the competent authority shall notify without delay the economic operator concerned of that measure, and shall at the same time inform that economic operator of the remedies available under the law or the administrative practice of the Member State concerned and of the time limits to which such remedies are subject. Where the measure is of general applicability, it shall be appropriately published.

2. Except in cases where immediate action is necessary for reasons of unacceptable risk to human health or safety, the economic operator concerned shall be given the opportunity to make submissions to the competent authority within an appropriate period of time that is clearly defined before any measure is adopted.

Where action has been taken without the economic operator having had the opportunity to make submissions as referred to in the first subparagraph, it shall be given the opportunity to make submissions as soon as possible and the action taken shall be reviewed promptly thereafter.

3. Any measure adopted shall be immediately withdrawn or amended upon the economic operator’s demonstrating that it has taken effective corrective action and that the device is in compliance with the requirements of this Regulation.

4. Where a measure adopted pursuant to Articles 95 to 98 concerns a device for which a notified body has been involved in the conformity assessment, the competent authorities shall by means of the electronic system referred to in Article 100 inform the relevant notified body and the authority responsible for the notified body of the measure taken.

MDR – Article 98 – Preventive health protection measures

Article 98

Preventive health protection measures

1. Where a Member State, after having performed an evaluation which indicates a potential risk related to a device or a specific category or group of devices, considers that, in order to protect the health and safety of patients, users or other persons or other aspects of public health, the making available on the market or putting into service of a device or a specific category or group of devices should be prohibited, restricted or made subject to particular requirements or that such device or category or group of devices should be withdrawn from the market or recalled, it may take any necessary and justified measures.

2. The Member State referred to in paragraph 1 shall immediately notify the Commission and all other Member States, giving the reasons for its decision, by means of the electronic system referred to in Article 100.

3. The Commission, in consultation with the MDCG and, where necessary, the economic operators concerned, shall assess the national measures taken. The Commission may decide, by means of implementing acts, whether the national measures are justified or not. In the absence of a Commission decision within six months of their notification, the national measures shall be considered to be justified. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(3).

4. Where the assessment referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article demonstrates that the making available on the market or putting into service of a device, specific category or group of devices should be prohibited, restricted or made subject to particular requirements or that such device or category or group of devices should be withdrawn from the market or recalled in all Member States in order to protect the health and safety of patients, users or other persons or other aspects of public health, the Commission may adopt implementing acts to take the necessary and duly justified measures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 114(3).