MDR – Article 63 – Informed consent

Article 63

Informed consent

1. Informed consent shall be written, dated and signed by the person performing the interview referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2, and by the subject or, where the subject is not able to give informed consent, his or her legally designated representative after having been duly informed in accordance with paragraph 2. Where the subject is unable to write, consent may be given and recorded through appropriate alternative means in the presence of at least one impartial witness. In that case, the witness shall sign and date the informed consent document. The subject or, where the subject is not able to give informed consent, his or her legally designated representative shall be provided with a copy of the document or the record, as appropriate, by which informed consent has been given. The informed consent shall be documented. Adequate time shall be given for the subject or his or her legally designated representative to consider his or her decision to participate in the clinical investigation.

2. Information given to the subject or, where the subject is not able to give informed consent, his or her legally designated representative for the purposes of obtaining his or her informed consent shall:

(a)enable the subject or his or her legally designated representative to understand:
(i) the nature, objectives, benefits, implications, risks and inconveniences of the clinical investigations;
(ii) the subject’s rights and guarantees regarding his or her
protection, in particular his or her right to refuse to participate in
and the right to withdraw from the clinical investigation at any time without any resulting detriment and without having to provide any justification;
(iii) the conditions under which the clinical investigations is to be
conducted, including the expected duration of the subject’s
participation in the clinical investigation; and
(iv) the possible treatment alternatives, including the follow-up
measures if the participation of the subject in the clinical
investigation is discontinued;
(b)be kept comprehensive, concise, clear, relevant, and understandable to the subject or his or her legally designated representative;
(c)be provided in a prior interview with a member of the investigating team who is appropriately qualified under national law;
(d)include information about the applicable damage compensation
system referred to in Article 69; and
(e)include the Union-wide unique single identification number of the
clinical investigation referred to in Article 70(1) and information
about the availability of the clinical investigation results in
accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article.

3. The information referred to in paragraph 2 shall be prepared in writing and be available to the subject or, where the subject is not able to give informed consent, his or her legally designated representative.

4. In the interview referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2, special attention shall be paid to the information needs of specific patient populations and of individual subjects, as well as to the methods used to give the information.

5. In the interview referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2, it shall be verified that the subject has understood the information.

6. The subject shall be informed that a clinical investigation report and a summary presented in terms understandable to the intended user will be made available pursuant to Article 77(5) in the electronic system on clinical investigations referred to in Article 73 irrespective of the outcome of the clinical investigation, and shall be informed, to the extent possible, when they have become available.

7. This Regulation is without prejudice to national law requiring that, in addition to the informed consent given by the legally designated representative, a minor who is capable of forming an opinion and assessing the information given to him or her, shall also assent in order to participate in a clinical investigation.

Leave a Reply